How we research and check sources

Boardzip is the publisher; guide work uses AI

Boardzip uses AI to assist with guide research, drafting and review. “By Boardzip” identifies the publisher. It does not identify a named human author or claim professional credentials, an organiser’s endorsement, an interview or first-hand attendance. AI review can miss errors and is not expert certification.

A useful guide should answer a specific Singapore reader’s question, explain its limits and offer a practical comparison, checklist or next question. Fictional examples are labelled. Event attendance, eligibility, an accepted booking and a hoped-for outcome remain separate decisions.

New and materially revised guides require retained source evidence and a separate review of the exact revision. We are also reconciling older guides’ evidence and review records. A published page or an automated completeness check alone does not establish that this reconciliation is finished for every guide.

Read each reference and its own check date

We use primary institutional or organiser information where available; read each reference at its stated scope. Each displayed source-check date comes from that reference’s recorded evidence. Checking one reference does not refresh another reference’s date. When a date is absent, the guide has no per-reference check date to display. A recorded check date alone does not establish a completed independent review of the guide.

An article’s publication and update dates describe the article. They do not establish that every source, event or booking condition was rechecked then. Historical programmes can explain a format; an archived example supplies no current place or booking right. Follow the linked source and check its current scope before relying on a condition.

Event facts come from the published source

Event records are collected from public source pages and checked for dated Singapore occurrences, admission evidence, access and location. A language model does not generate the event records. Records expire after 24 hours without a successful verification; registration closure and ended sessions can remove them sooner.

Free admission requires evidence. A free registration form does not establish that a paid activity costs nothing. Conditional prices, host approval and known eligibility terms must remain visible. Unknown or conflicting information can hold a listing back. Hidden meeting points stay hidden.

Source coverage is incomplete, and an organiser can change its terms after a check. A guide’s topic match does not confirm your suitability, accessibility, a remaining place or an accepted registration. Check the official listing before making plans.

See source coverage and collection outcomes →

The same public pages serve readers and search engines

Our public guides and listings use readable HTML, ordinary links, canonical URLs and a sitemap. Search and AI-answer services decide whether to index or cite them. Publication is not evidence of a ranking or an AI citation.

Search access and model-training crawlers are separate controls. Our crawler rules explicitly allow OAI-SearchBot to read public pages while keeping API routes excluded. OAI-SearchBot is distinct from GPTBot, which is used for model training. This search-access setting does not change the site’s training-crawler permissions.

Google’s guidance on AI features and standard search requirements · OpenAI’s crawler documentation

Choose the next useful step

See the checked weekend shortlist · Find a guide for your question · Suggest a useful organiser